Kia Syros And Skoda Kylaq Are For Very Different Buyers
The Skoda Kylaq and Kia Syros sit in the same segment and will have overlaps in price. But as similar as they seem, they cater to very different buyers!
-
The Kia Syros is based on a reinforced K1 platform. The K1 platform underpins models like the Hyundai Grand i10 and Exter.
-
The Skoda Kylaq is based on the same MQB A0 IN platform as the Skoda Kushaq and Volkswagen Taigun.
-
While both get 1-litre turbo-petrol engines, only the Syros offers the option of diesel power.
On first impressions, the Skoda Kylaq and Kia Syros seem like hot cross-shopping candidates given how much they have in common. However, driving both cars reveals how different they are in character and how they’re likely to appeal to completely different kinds of people. To understand why, we must first understand why these cars were developed.
Why Did Kia Make The Syros?
As much variety and diversity as the sub-compact SUV segment offers, a core complaint most buyers have is the lack of space. In their fully-loaded variants these small cars offer segment-above features like a panoramic sunroof, seat ventilation or ADAS but often feel cramped inside.
Kia identified the core need was flexibility. A fixed luggage space means compromised cabin room even when the boot is not in use which is often the case especially during office commutes. By applying the tall-boy design, engineering a wheelbase that’s only 60mm short of the Seltos’ and offering flexible seating, the Syros manages to offer not only features but space from a segment above.
Kia Syros |
|
Length (mm) |
3995 mm |
Width (mm) |
1805 mm |
Height (mm) |
1680 mm |
Wheelbase (mm) |
2550 mm |
Why Did Skoda Make The Kylaq?
The Kylaq simply offers almost every value of the larger Kushaq on a smaller and more affordable scale. For the longest time, there has been a blank space for buyers who want European design and driving dynamics at an affordable price. The last car to offer it was the Volkswagen Polo and in many ways, the Kylaq delivers the Polo’s charm with more features, better space, better ride and more practicality too. Importantly, it has opened up an opportunity for Skoda to offer a car for under Rs 10 lakh.
Skoda Kylaq |
|
Length (mm) |
3995 mm |
Width (mm) |
1783 mm |
Height (mm) |
1619 mm* |
Wheelbase (mm) |
2566 mm |
*Including roof rails
How They’re So Different!
Looks
The Kia Syros’ styling is very unusual and certainly polarising. The tall-boy styling has made many online assume it’s a rival to the Maruti Suzuki WagonR though it’s a much more premium product. Both cars offer 17-inch wheels too but the design of the Syros’ wheels is very quirky. This same theme is seen across the car and all profiles of the Syros look like they belong to different cars.
In contrast, the Kylaq is a subtle, typically European looking car. There’s no overuse of cuts and creases, the light design is similar to global siblings like the Elroq and Enyaq and it’s a styling package that’s more universally-appealing.
Features
This is one aspect where the Syros has the Kylaq beat.
-
The Syros’ 8-speaker Harman Kardon sound system offers better sound quality than the Kylaq’s 6-speaker setup
-
Kia’s 12.3-inch touchscreen offers better resolution and responsiveness although the Kylaq’s 10.1-inch screen isn’t far behind. Both offer wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay
-
Skoda offers front seat ventilation while the Syros gets it at the rear as well
-
The Kylaq gets a single-pane sunroof while the Syros gets a panoramic sunroof
The Syros also offers ADAS which the Kylaq does not. One advantage the Kylaq has is the availability of powered front seats. Only the driver’s seat is 4-way power-adjustable in the Syros wherein the height-adjustment is manual.
Ride, Performance Handling
This is where the Kylaq truly shines! Not only is it more fun to drive, the Kylaq also offers more balanced ride quality. High speed stability, cornering grip and suspension bump absorption are all better in the Kylaq.
In comparison, the ride quality of the Syros is soft. While this makes it comfortable at low speeds, it can feel slightly bouncy at highway speeds and the suspension also doesn’t insulate occupants from potholes or bump shock as well as the Kylaq does.
The Kylaq’s 115 PS 1-litre turbo-petrol engine is as smooth to use for daily drives as the Syros’ but the performance is far more explosive when you want it! The Skoda can hit and cross 100kmph with a lot more ease.
Parameters |
Skoda Kylaq |
Engine |
1-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol |
Power (PS) |
115 PS |
Torque (Nm) |
178 Nm |
Transmission Options |
6-speed MT / 6-speed AT* |
Claimed Fuel Efficiency |
19.68 kmpl (MT) / 19.05 kmpl (AT*) |
*Automatic transmission
One benefit of the Syros remains the availability of a diesel engine which the Kylaq misses out on.
Parameters |
Kia Syros Turbo-petrol |
Kia Syros Diesel |
Engine |
1-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol |
1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel |
Power (PS) |
120 PS |
116 PS |
Torque (Nm) |
172 Nm |
250 Nm |
Transmission Options |
6-speed MT / 7-speed DCT^ |
6-speed MT / 6-speed AT* |
Claimed Fuel Efficiency |
18.2 kmpl (MT) / 17.68 kmpl (DCT^) |
20.75 kmpl (MT) / 17.65 kmpl (AT*) |
*Automatic transmission
^Dual-clutch transmission
Which One Is Better?
That’s entirely decided by the kind of buyer you are. The Kia Syros offers superior space and practicality along with a much richer features list.
The Skoda Kylaq on the other hand offers just the right amount of features but has more appeal for buyers who want better driving dynamics and exciting performance.