New Maruti Alto K10 CNG vs Rivals: Specifications Compared
Modified On Nov 22, 2022 01:20 PM By Rohit for Maruti S-Presso
- 24.8K Views
- Write a comment
Apart from the Alto 800, which gets a 0.8-litre petrol engine, all other models here share the same 1-litre powertrain
Maruti’s CNG portfolio recently gained another member, its eleventh, in the form of the third-generation Alto K10 CNG. With its launch, all Maruti hatchbacks are now being offered with the alternative fuel option.
It can get confusing in case you are looking for a Maruti hatchback with the CNG option up to the compact segment because you have as many as five CNG models, viz, Alto 800, Alto K10, S-Presso, Celerio and Wagon R.
So, in this story, we decided to put your worries to rest by comparing all the details you must know of these Maruti CNG hatchbacks. But first, let’s start by comparing their prices:
Alto 800 CNG |
Alto K10 CNG |
S-Presso CNG |
Celerio CNG |
Wagon R CNG |
– |
– |
LXi- Rs 5.90 lakh |
– |
LXi- Rs 6.42 lakh |
LXi (O)- Rs 5.03 lakh |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
VXi- Rs 5.95 lakh |
VXi- Rs 6.10 lakh |
VXi- Rs 6.69 lakh |
VXi- Rs 6.86 lakh |
As is evident from the above table, it’s the Alto 800 which gets the most affordable CNG variant while the Wagon R is the priciest of the lot.
Powertrain Check
In CNG mode |
Alto 800 CNG |
Alto K10 CNG |
S-Presso CNG |
Celerio CNG |
Wagon R CNG |
Engine |
0.8-litre |
1-litre |
|||
Power |
41PS |
57PS |
|||
Torque |
60Nm |
82.1Nm |
|||
Transmission |
5-speed MT |
5-speed MT |
|||
Claimed fuel efficiency |
31.59km/kg |
33.85km/kg |
32.73km/kg |
35.6km/kg |
34.05km/kg |
Apart from the Alto 800, which features a 0.8-litre petrol engine, all other models here have been provided with the same 1-litre Dual Jet petrol unit. Maruti is offering all the above-mentioned CNG cars only with a five-speed manual transmission. It’s only the Wagon R here which also gets a larger 1.2-litre petrol engine as well, albeit without the CNG option. The Celerio CNG stands out as the most fuel-efficient car in this list.
Related: Maruti Making Good On Its Mission Green Million With New Strong Hybrid And CNG Models
What’s Different In Equipment?
While the Alto 800 is only available in the mid-spec LXi (O) trim, the S-Presso and Wagon R are offered in two CNG variants: mid-spec LXi and VXi. The Alto K10 and Celerio CNG, on the other hand, are only sold in mid-spec VXi trims.
Here’s what’s on offer in the five hatchbacks:
Alto 800’s highlights |
Alto K10’s highlights |
S-Presso’s highlights |
Celerio’s highlights |
Wagon R’s highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
All Maruti CNG cars mentioned here get some common touches such as full wheel covers, manual AC, front power windows and dual front airbags. That said, it’s the Celerio and Wagon R which go the extra mile thanks to their extra premium, that gives them some brownie points in the form of all four power windows, electrically adjustable ORVMs and a day/night IRVM (inside rearview mirror). A touchscreen system is absent from the equipment list of all the CNG-equipped cars mentioned in this list.
The Alto K10 CNG isn't as feature rich as the three pricier models, but it does come with some conveniences like front power windows, internally adjustable ORVMs and a two-speaker music system.
Also See: Maruti Brezza CNG’s Boot Space Seen For The First Time!
Parting Thoughts
While all models, save for the Alto 800, get the same 1-litre engine and a near-identical features list, it’s the Celerio that offers the highest claimed mileage among the lot. If you want a more premium, spacious and feature-loaded Maruti CNG car, you can pick between the Celerio and Wagon R which get some niceties over the other affordable models as mentioned above. That said, the Alto 800 is the clear winner when it comes to being the most-affordable CNG vehicle in Maruti’s lineup.
The Alto K10 is the top choice for the entry-level Maruti CNG, as it offers better economy than the S-Presso and more of everything compared to the much more affordable Alto 800 CNG.
All prices, ex-showroom Delhi
Read More on : Maruti S-Presso on road price
3 out of 3 found this helpful