• English
    • Login / Register

    Mahindra XUV300 Vs Tata Nexon Vs Ford EcoSport Vs Honda WR-V (Petrol): Real-world Performance Comparison

    Modified On Apr 08, 2019 10:34 AM By Sonny for Mahindra XUV300

    • 245.4K Views
    • Write a comment

    Which of these petrol-powered sub-4 metre SUVs offer the best performance in terms of acceleration, braking and economy on the open road? Let’s find out

    The sub-4 metre SUV segment continues to grow in popularity and we’ve recently got our hands on the new petrol-powered Mahindra XUV300. While not meant for sporty performance, acceleration and braking are important aspects of daily use as well as road trips. Of course, fuel economy is a big concern as well when it comes to the petrol-engined variants.

    Mahindra XUV300

    First, let’s take a look at the engine specifications of these sub-4m SUVs:

    Engine Specifications

    Model

    Engine

    Power

    Torque

    Transmission

    Mahindra XUV300

    1.2-litre

    110PS

    200Nm

    6MT

    Tata Nexon

    1.2-litre

    110PS

    170Nm

    6MT/6AMT

    Ford EcoSport

    1.5-litre/1.0-litre

    123PS/125PS

    150Nm/170Nm

    5MT, 6AT/6MT

    Honda WR-V

    1.2-litre

    90PS

    110Nm

    5MT

    Ford EcoSport

    In terms of engine sizes, the Ford has the biggest unit on offer and the most powerful as well. However, it’s the smaller Ford turbo-petrol engine that makes the most power while the 1.5-litre engine puts out 2PS and 20Nm less. All the other competitors here use a 1.2-litre petrol engine. The XUV300 has the torquiest turbo-petrol engine on offer. In terms of transmissions, Mahindra isn’t yet offering an automatic option but only a 6-speed manual with the petrol engine. The Nexon petrol comes with both 6-speed manual and AMT option while the WR-V only gets a 5-speed manual. Ford, meanwhile, offers a 6-speed manual with the 1.0-litre EcoBoost engine while the 1.5-litre engine comes with a choice of a 5-speed manual or a 6-speed auto.

    Given the variety of engines, transmissions and available data, we will only be comparing real-world performance of the petrol-manual versions of all these sub-4m SUVs.

    Honda WR-V: Road test review

    Performance Tests

     

    0-100kmph

    Quarter Mile

    30-80kmph (3rd gear)

    40-100kmph (4th gear)

    Mahindra XUV300

    12.39s

    18.47s @ 122.63kmph

    8.65s

    14.11s

    Tata Nexon

    11.64s

    17.81s @ 123.21kmph

    10.91s

    19.09s

    Ford EcoSport 1.5P

    12.12s

    18.26s @ 123.64kmph

    10.2s

    17.59s

    Honda WR-V

    15.31s

    20s @ 113.24kmph

    11.67s

    20.54s

    Tata Nexon

    While not the most powerful or torquiest car here, the Nexon was the quickest to accelerate from zero to 100kmph and quickest to cover the quarter mile as well. However, the XUV300 was the quickest to accelerate up to speed in specific gears by quite some margin.

    The Honda WR-V with the least torque was the slowest in all tests and the most powerful EcoSport turned out to be the second quickest in accelerating from a standstill to 100kph and completing the quarter-mile.

    Honda WR-V: Road test review

    Braking Distance

     

    100-0kmph

    80-0kmph

    Mahindra XUV300

    41.59m

    25.44m

    Tata Nexon

    40.63m

    25.58m

    Ford EcoSport 1.5P

    47.93m

    29.81m

    Honda WR-V

    42.21m

    26.09m

    The XUV300 is the only sub-4m SUV to get disc brakes on all four corners while the rest have disc brakes up front and drum brakes at the rear. The Mahindra covers the shortest distance when coming to a halt from 80kmph. However, from 100kmph, it is second to the Tata Nexon. The Ford EcoSport has the longest braking distance in both tests.

    Mahindra XUV300

    Fuel Efficiency

    Mileage (kmpl)

    Mahindra XUV300

    Tata Nexon

    Ford EcoSport 1.5P

    Honda WR-V

    City

    12.16kmpl

    14.03kmpl

    12.74kmpl

    13.29kmpl

    Highway

    14.25kmpl

    17.89kmpl

    17.59kmpl

    18.06kmpl

    In terms of real world fuel economy, the Nexon was the most frugal in city driving, ahead of the WR-V and EcoSport in that order. The Mahindra XUV300 was the thirstiest of the lot in both conditions, worryingly so on the highway. The Honda was the most efficient on the highway, ahead of the Nexon and the EcoSport, in that order.

    Read More on : Mahindra XUV300 on road price

    Was this article helpful ?

    7 out of 8 found this helpful

    Write your Comment on Mahindra XUV300

    Trending SUV Cars

    • Latest
    • Upcoming
    • Popular
    ×
    We need your city to customize your experience